Stop Guessing Your APPA Level: Is Your Budget Paying for Cleaning You Don't Need?
This episode explains how to stop guessing a campus's APPA cleaning level. APPA defines five appearance levels. Level 1 is orderly spotlessness, Level 2 is ordinary tidiness, Level 3 is casual inattention, and Levels 4 and 5 are dinginess and neglect. A higher number means less frequent service and a lower appearance. Not every space needs Level 1. A main entrance on admissions day does. A mechanical room nobody sees does not.
Keith Mowen describes a common pattern. A campus sets one target level and cleans to it everywhere on a static schedule. Empty buildings get over-served, while busy spaces like the student union slide to Level 3 or worse. Most campuses cannot say, building by building, what level they fund and what level they deliver.
The fix is to let measured usage set the level. Occupancy data shows how much each area is used, and each space gets the level its real use requires. Hours move from empty space to busy space with the same total effort. Published production rates assume a fixed schedule, so a program driven by usage data and a dynamic schedule can get more from each hour than those rates assume.
Frequently asked questions
What are the five APPA appearance levels?
Level 1 is orderly spotlessness, Level 2 is ordinary tidiness, Level 3 is casual inattention, and Levels 4 and 5 are dinginess and neglect. The higher the number, the less frequent the service and the lower the appearance.
Should every campus space be cleaned to APPA Level 1 or 2?
No. High-visibility, high-traffic spaces such as main entrances and a busy student union earn Level 1 or 2, while a rarely used archive wing can safely sit at Level 3 or 4. The right level depends on how each space is actually used.
How can occupancy data be used to set APPA levels?
Sensors measure how much each building and area is used, and each space is assigned the APPA level that matches its use. Hours that were over-serving empty space are redirected to high-traffic space that was slipping.
How can a data-driven custodial program beat standard production rates?
Published production rates assume a fixed schedule and cleaning by habit, with slack built in. When live usage data and a dynamic schedule aim every hour at the space that needs it, the same budget can buy a higher appearance level, or the current level can cost less to deliver.
Full transcript
Here's a question most campus budgets can't answer: what level of clean are you actually paying for?
There's an industry standard for this — five defined levels, from spotless down to neglected. Most campuses will tell you they're funded for Level 2. But here's the truth on almost every campus I've walked: they're funded for one level, and they're delivering a patchwork of all five — without knowing which space is getting which. They're guessing. And guessing is expensive.
I'm Keith Mowen, the CEO of Contract Service Solutions, a leading facilities and custodial services provider. Let me show you how to stop guessing your APPA level — and why the campuses that measure it get more clean for the same dollar.
Quick primer, because this is the vocabulary every facilities budget should be built on. The industry — APPA — defines five appearance levels.
Level 1 is orderly spotlessness — a showcase. Level 2 is ordinary tidiness — clean, professional, what most people expect of a good building. Level 3 is casual inattention — you start to notice. Levels 4 and 5 are dinginess and neglect — the ones that end up in a complaint, or a photo a parent takes on a tour.
Here's the key that trips people up: the higher the number, the less frequent the service, and the lower the appearance. So Level 1 costs the most to maintain, Level 4 the least. And here's the thing — not every space should be Level 1. Your main entrance on admissions day? Level 1 or 2, absolutely. A mechanical room nobody sees? Paying Level 1 money for that is a waste. The right answer is different for every space.
So here's how it usually goes wrong. A campus sets a target — we're a Level 2 campus — and then cleans on a static schedule built years ago to hit that number everywhere. Same frequency, building to building, whether or not the usage justifies it.
Two expensive things happen at once. You over-serve the spaces nobody's using — you're paying Level 2 effort on a building that sat nearly empty all semester. And you under-serve the spaces that are slammed — the student union during peak weeks quietly slides to a Level 3 or worse, because the static schedule never accounted for how busy it actually got.
So ask the question from the last video a different way: are you cleaning each space to the level its real use demands — or just to the level the old static schedule assumed? Most campuses genuinely can't answer that. They can't tell you, building by building, what level they're funded for, what level they're actually delivering, and whether the two match. That gap — between assumed and actual — is where the budget leaks and the complaints come from.
Here's the fix, and it's the whole idea in one sentence: let real usage set the level.
Remember the sensors — the door counters, the occupancy data. Now point them at this problem. Instead of guessing, you measure how much each building and each area actually gets used. Then you assign the appropriate APPA level to match. The busy union, the packed lecture halls, the main entrances — they earn Level 1 or 2, and they get it consistently, because the data proves they need it. The archive wing that sees a handful of people a week? It can safely sit at a Level 3 or 4 — cleaned less often, because honestly, that's all its use requires.
Watch what that does to the budget. The hours you were quietly wasting over-serving empty space get redirected to the high-traffic space that was silently slipping. Nothing gets neglected that people actually experience — and nothing gets gold-plated that nobody sees. Same total effort. Aimed by data instead of habit. Every space at the level it has actually earned.
Now here's the part that gets a CFO's attention. The industry doesn't just publish appearance levels — it publishes production rates: how many square feet one person can clean, per level, in a shift. Those rates are the benchmark almost every custodial budget in the country is built on.
But look closely at what those standard rates assume. They assume a fixed schedule. They assume you're cleaning by habit. They assume you don't know, day to day, where the work actually is — so they build in the slack of a team working a little blind.
We're not working blind. When your service is driven by live usage data and a dynamic schedule — when every hour is aimed at exactly the space that needs it, and none is spent on the space that doesn't — you get more out of each labor hour than those standard rates assume you can. The benchmark was written for guessing. Measuring beats it.
For you, that shows up one of two ways, your choice: the same budget buys a higher, more consistent appearance level than the tables say it should — or you hold your current level and it costs less to deliver. Either way, you've beaten the standard, because you stopped guessing.
So what changes when usage sets the level?
You can finally answer the question we started with. Walk into a budget meeting and show it: here's how every building was actually used, here's the level each one is set to and why, here's your cost per cleanable square foot, and here's the quality score proving you're delivering it. That's not an opinion anymore — it's data your board can trust.
You stop overpaying for empty space. You stop under-serving the spaces that shape how your campus is judged. And you beat the published production standard, because your program measures what everyone else assumes. Same mission, a sharper dollar — and a facilities line you can finally defend with numbers.
If you found value in that, I put out one short video like this every week — one idea from where campus facilities are heading, no pitch. Subscribe to the newsletter or follow the channel, whichever you prefer — the link's below.
And if you'd like to know what level each of your spaces is actually funded for versus what it needs — that's exactly what a Campus Opportunity Assessment measures. The first conversation is free — and our promise on the on-site assessment: if we don't find you real opportunities, it's free. Just reply to the email that brought you here.
I'm Keith Mowen. Thanks for the time — and the next time someone tells you what level your campus is cleaned to, ask them how they know.
Request a Campus Opportunity Assessment
The first conversation is free, and our promise on the on-site assessment: if we don't find you real opportunities, it's free.
Request a Campus Opportunity Assessment All episodes